Bowl Championship Stupidity

                
                
                

		
		
		


	
	
        
 »  Home  »  College Football  »  Bowl Championship Stupidity
Bowl Championship Stupidity
By Jonathan Bentz | Published  01/10/2007 | College Football | Rating:
Jonathan Bentz
Jonathan Bentz graduated from West Virginia University on the four year plan. He was once a stringer and wire contributor for the AP at WVU football and basketball games; now he markets Nemacolin Woodlands Resort online. Some say Jay-Z bit his style, and Tom Cruise has recently been cast to star in his biopic, due next Christmas. He bleeds BLUE and GOLD, pays homage to Mike Gansey with every 3-ball he swishes, and dreams of being the first whiteboy to dunk a 720. Give him a shout at jonathan.bentz@atomicsportsmedia.com.
 

View all articles by Jonathan Bentz

Bowl Championship Stupidity
Taking away the importance of regular season games is another 'concern' that doesn't hold water. Major programs in big-time conferences are always going to have important regular season games, and using the BCS formula to determine the at-large playoff bids ensures that independents and teams in lesser conferences will have to play competitive schedules, rather than the patsies they usually feast on. (This means you Notre Dame.)

A playoff would cheapen the regular season? Please. This year’s Ohio State-Michigan game was a classic that many viewed as the real national championship (until Monday night at least). Now imagine the intensity and importance of this season’s battle if it had been for an automatic berth, number one seed in the playoffs, a Big Ten championship, and an undefeated season all at once.

We all know that the biggest reason the BCS exists is money. As an outspoken fan of the greenback, part of me can’t argue with the BCS conferences for taking the loot and leaving the smaller fish out at sea. But compare the money the BCS gains from its TV contract against the windfall generated by college basketball’s March Madness.

Fox is paying roughly $80 million dollars a year for four of the BCS games (the Rose Bowl still gets its loot from ABC). Not bad, right?

Well CBS paid 1.7 billion dollars to air March Madness for four years… through 2002. I couldn’t find up to date numbers on how much CBS is paying currently for March Madness, but with a conservative estimate at inflation, I’m guessing it’s over two billion dollars for four or five years.

Last time I checked, $400 million is at least a little bit more than $80 million. I realize a 16-team, eight game tournament may pale in comparison to a 65-team, 33-game tournament when it comes to the number of TV ads a network can sell, but the quality of competition isn’t comparable. College football is a much stronger brand than college basketball, and a 16-team tournament would bring the best of the best in a head-to-head competition that has never happened before and would draw spectacular ratings.
 
From the outside looking in, the NCAA, BCS chairmen, and network television stand to gain a lot more from instituting a playoff than from shunning it.

I don’t care if they scoff at my idea, but something has to change. There is no reason an undefeated team should be left out of a chance at a championship because six conferences have the preordained right to some extra cash… especially when there is more money to be made with a college playoff.

If you really want the big bucks BCS, spot the ball for a I-A playoff.

How would you rate the quality of this article?
1 2 3 4 5
Poor Excellent

Verification:
Enter the security code shown below:
imgRegenerate Image


Add comment
Comments
  • Comment #1 (Posted by likey nolikey)
    Rating
    Someone already wrote that article on the site...even gave scenarios and updated his blogs with current. His idea of an 8 team is more likable and do-able. You want WAC and Sun-Belt teams in this dance?? You're going to end up dropping SEC, Big Ten, Big East teams that had a legit shot.
     
  • Comment #2 (Posted by an unknown user)
    Rating
    Gee, your views are the same as the entire world! We all know the system sucks, why do you people still write stories about how much it sucks? Give me something different.
     
  • Comment #3 (Posted by Jonathan Bentz)
    Rating
    So getting different playoff scenarios out there is apparently a bad idea...?

    I think it's ridiculous that an undefeated team is left standing - alone - and had no shot at the title.

    And look, if Boise was one of two undefeateds, I would have been cool with crowning the "BIG BOY SCHOOL" as the champs and had no beef with the BCS...

    just like I said in my article.

    Events like this need to be marked and shunned if change is ever going to happen.

    Glad I took the time to make my case.
     
Submit Comment